The need analysis development of mathematics learning model based realistic mathematical education and literacy in junior high school

Rusdi Rusdi(1*), I Made Arnawa(2), Ahmad Fauzan(3), Lufri Lufri(4)
  • (1) Institut Agama Islam Negeri Bukittinggi
  • (2) Universitas Negeri Padang
  • (3) Universitas Negeri Padang
  • (4) Universitas Negeri Padang
  • (*) Corresponding Author

Abstract

The research was due to Indonesian students’ literacy in mathematics was unsatisfying according to Programme for International Student Assessment. The aim of this research is to analyze main necessities which grounded the prominence to develop a learning model. This research belongs to descriptive study. Based on data analyzed, the findings reveal that 1) the teachers’ knowledge about mathematical literacy was low, 2) the learning approach still did not related to the material with the context of students’ daily lives, 3) the average value of students' mathematical literacy was 31.87 be classified into low category, and 4) the assessment instruments was far from the mathematical literacy, 5) realistic mathematics education approach ever developed by researchers in learning mathematics has not been combined with the concept of literacy. Based on these findings, the researcher needs to develop mathematics learning model based on realistic mathematical education and literacy in junior high school.

Keywords

need analysis, realistic mathematical education, mathematical literacy

References

  1. BSNP. (2010). Paradigma Pendidikan Nasional Abad XXI.
  2. de Lang, Jane. (2003). Mathematics for Literacy, dalam Quantitative Literacy, Why Numeracy Matters for schools and Colleges, Proceding of the National Foum on Quantitative Literacy. Washington D.C.: National Academy of Sciences.
  3. Fauzan, Ahmad. (2002). Applying Realistic Mathematics Education in Teaching Geometri in Indonesian Primary School. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.
  4. Hasbullah. (2015). Kebijakan Pendidikan dalam Perspektif Teori, Aplikasi dan Kondisi Objektif Pendidikan di Indonesia. Jakarta: PT RajaGrafindo Persada.
  5. Kusumadhani D.N, Waluya, S. B dan Rusilowati A. (2015). Mathematics Literacy Based on Adversity Quotient on the Discovery Learning and Guilford Approach. Sutikno, Widiyatmoko A, Masturi, Purwinarko A, (Eds.) Proceeding of International Cconference on Mathematics, Science, and Education. Applied Research of Mathematics and Natural Sciences to Improve Its Usefulness for Knowledge and Society. Semarang, 5-6 September 2015. Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences Semarang State university (ME-18).
  6. Kusumah, Yaya S. (2011). Literasi Matematis. Noer, S. H, Rosyidin, U, Fadiawati, N, Hasnunidah, N, (Eds.) Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan MIPA. Pengembangan Pembelajaran MIPA Berorientasi Soft Skill Universitas. Bandar Lampung, 26 November 2011. PMIPA FKIP Universitas Lampung (U-1).
  7. Lin, Su-Wei dan Tai, Wen-Chun. (2015). Latent Class Analysis of Students’ Mathematics Learning Strategies and the Realtionship between Learning Strategy and Mathematical Literacy. Universal Journal of Educational Research 3(6): 390-395.
  8. Musdi, Edwin. (2014). Pengembangan Model Pembelajaran Geometri Berbasis Pendidikan Matematika Realistik SMPN Kota Padang. Disertasi, UNP Padang.
  9. OECD. 2014. PISA (2012) Result: Creative Problem Solving: Students’ Skill in Tackling Real-Life Problems (Volume V), PISA, OECD Publishing.
  10. Ojose, Bobby. (2011). Mathematics Literacy: Are We Able to Put The Mathematics We Learn into Everyday Use? Journal of Mathematics Education, Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 89-100.
  11. Pulungan. (2014). Pengembangan Instrumen Tes Literasi Matematika. Jurnal of Educational Research and Evaluation. 3 (2): 74-78.
  12. Riyanto, Yatim. (2012). Paradikma Baru Pembelajaran, Sebagai Referensi bagi Pendidik dalam Implementasi Pembelajaran yang Efektif dan Berkualitas. Jakarta: Kencana.
  13. Sari, Rosalia H. N. (2015). Literasi Matematika: Apa, Mengapa dan Bagaimana? Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika, UNY.
  14. Stacey, K dan Turner, R. (2015). Assessing Mathematical Literacy, The PISA Experience. Australia: Springer 2015.
  15. Sugiyono. (2010). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan, Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
  16. Sukardi. (2004). Metodologi Penelitian Pendidikan: Kompetensi dan Praktiknya. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
  17. Supardi. (2013). Aplikasi Statistika dalam Penelitian. Konsep Statistika yang Lebih Komprehensif. Jakarta: Change Publication.
  18. Wardhani, S dan Rumiati. (2011). Instrumen penilaian hasil Belajar Matematika SMP: Belajar dari PISA dan TIMSS. Jakarta, Kemendiknas.
  19. Wijaya, Ariyadi. (2012). Pendidikan Matematika Realistik. Suatu Alternatif Pendekatan Pembelajaran Matematika.Yogyakarta:

DOI : https://doi.org/10.32698/2413

International Conference on Education, Islamic Studies and Social Sciences Research

International Conference on Education, Islamic Studies and Social Sciences Research

Fakultas Ilmu Pendidikan UNP

978-989-758-296-0

978-602-50676-0-1

November 2018

  View Articles

© 2024 GCI, Global Conferences Index, Lda - All rights reserved.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.