Measurement of rational thinking skills in people affected by annual floods

I Gusti Ayu Agung Noviekayati; Djoko Budi Utomo; Herlan Pratikto

doi:10.32698/25257

Measurement of rational thinking skills in people affected by annual floods

I Gusti Ayu Agung Noviekayati⁽¹⁾, Djoko Budi Utomo⁽²⁾, Herlan Pratikto⁽³⁾

(1) Universitas 17 Agustus 1945
(2) Universitas 17 Agustus 1945
(3) Universitas 17 Agustus 1945

Abstract

Disaster is an unplanned event with great physical and psychological effects. The ability of communities to cope with disasters varies greatly. Starting from the ability to think simple about disasters to critical strategic thinking skills. Research on the ability to think rationally at the time of disaster is still very little. This is due to the concentration of research on disasters aimed at mitigation and post-disaster that are physical, emotional and behavioral. Research on rational decisions has been researched for purposes such as management, politics, sustainable energy, education. In the field of psychology, rational decisions are examined in industry and organizations. Examining this rational decision needed in the field of disaster is to reduce vulnerability to become victims in disaster areas.

Keywords

rational thinking skills, annual floods

References

Aikenhead, GS, AG Ryan, and RW Flemming. (1989). Views on science-society-technology (VOSTS) . Department of Curriculum Studies, College of Education, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
Cleminson, A. (1990). Establising an Epistemological base for science teaching in light of contemporary learning and science. Journal of research in science teaching. 27: 429-445
De Sousa, R. (2007). Why think? Evolution and the rational mind . Oxford: Oxford University Press
Etzioni, A. (2014). Treating rationality as a continuous variable. Society. 51. 393-400
Frank, RH (2004). What price the moral high ground? . Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
Giddings, JG (1982). The presuppositions in theool science textbooks. Dissertation. Published ideas in Alters, BJ 1997. Journal of research in science teaching 34: 39-55
Glynn, PD, AA Voinov, CD Shapiro, PA, White. (2017). From Data to Decision: Processing Information, Biases, and Beliefs for proven Management of Natural Resources and Environment .DOI: 1002 / 2016EF000487.
Goodall, J., Lee, C. (2015). Trauma and Public Memory . New York: Palgrave MacMillan
Hurley, S., &Nudds, M. (2006). The questions of animal rationality: Theory and evidence . In S. Hurley & M. Nudds (Eds). Rational Animals? 1-83. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Jordan, RC, WRBrooks, JR Delisi, SA Gray, AR Berkowitz. (2015). Ecology of the nature of the science of shared discussions and practices among ecologists and high school teachers.Echophere 6 (11). 223
Rappange, DA, WBF, Brouwer and JV Exel. (2014). Rational Expectations? An Explorative Study of Subjective Survival Probabilities and Lifestyle across Europe. Health Expectations, 19. 121-137
Stanovich, KE, West, RF, Toplak, ME (2016). The Rationality Quotient: Toward a Test of Rational Thinking . Cambridge: The MIT Press
West, RF, Toplak, M., & Stanovich, KE (2008). Heuristics and biases as measures of critical thinking: Associations with cognitive ability and thinking dispositions. Journal of Education Psychology, 100, 930-941.

Proceeding:

International Conference of Mental Health, Neuroscience, and Cyber-psychology

Publisher:

Fakultas Ilmu Pendidikan

ISBN (Print):

978-989-758-798-0

ISBN (Electronic):

978-602-50690-0-1

Published:

December 2018

View Articles