Intensive reading skills with cooperative integrated reading composition (CIRC) and group investigation (GI)

Ika Panggih Wahyuningtyas(1*), Ermanto Ermanto(2), Abdurahman Abdurahman(3)
  • (1) Universitas Negeri Padang
  • (2) Universitas Negeri Padang
  • (3) Universitas Negeri Padang
  • (*) Corresponding Author

Abstract

This research aims to know the difference in the results of learning to read with intensive using the model of the CIRC and learning motivation of GI in grade VII MTs Country Muara Bulian. This type of research was quasi experiment (experiment of the artificial) and design used in this study is a 2 x 2 factorial. This research population is students of Class VII MTs Country Muara Bulian. First, The average reading skills of students who are taught in an intensive learning CIRC. was 81.00, while students taught with model GI was 79.40. Both , the average the learning model CIRC. is 83.25, students learning motivation high taught with model GI was 84.40. Third, the average reading skills of students ' learning motivation low intensive taught by learning model CIRC. was 78.75 and taught with model GI is 74.40.

Keywords

the difference, read-intensive, CIRC, GI, learning motivation

References

  1. Abdurahman and Ellya Ratna. (2003). Evaluation of learning the language and literature of Indonesia. Textbook. The Field: State University Of Padang.
  2. Arikunto, Suharsimi. (2006). the procedure of research. Jakarta: Cipta Rineka.
  3. Depertemen National Education. (2006). Guide the development of the syllabus Subjects Indonesian Language middle school. Jakarta: Directorate General management of primary and secondary education.
  4. Dimyati and Mudjiono. Innovation Learning in class. Jakarta: Aksara Earth.
  5. Esther Tovli. (2014). "The Joy of Reading"-An Intervention Program to Increase Reading Motivation for Pupils with Learning Disabilities. Journal of Education and Trainin. Journal. Vol. 2, no. 4; October 2014 ISSN 2324-805X E-ISSN 2324-8068 Published by Redfame Publishing URL: http://jets.redfame.com .
  6. James l. Collins (2016). Bringing Together Reading and Writing: An Experimental Study of Writing Intensive Reading Comprehension in Low Performing Urban Elementary Schools. Journal. Literacy. ISSN 61577.
  7. Istarani. (2012). the innovative Learning Model 58. Terrain: Media Persada.
  8. Riduwan and Sunato. (2012). Introduction to Statistics: for educational research, social, communications, economics, and business. Bandung: Alfabeta.
  9. Saddhono, Kundharu and St. y. Slamet. (2012). Designing a Model of learning: innovative, progressive, and contextual. Jakarta:
  10. Prenadamedai Group.
  11. Slavin, R.E. (2010). Cooperatif Learning, theory,
  12. research and practice (English translation:
  13. Yusron Nurulita). Bandung: Nusa Media.
  14. Sugiyono. (2012). a quantitative approach to Educational Research Methods, qualitative, and R & d. Bandung: Alfabeta.
  15. UNO, Hamza b. (2011). The Model of learning: creating teaching and learning in creative and effective. Jakarta: Aksara Earth.
  16. Trianto , Ibn Badr al-Tabany. (2014). Designing a Model of learning: innovative, progressive, and contextual. Jakarta: Prenadamedai Group.
  17. Wena, Made. (2009). Contemporary Innovative Learning Strategies: A Conceptual Overview Operasioanal. Jakarta: Aksara Earth.

DOI : https://doi.org/10.29210/2018111

International Conferences on Educational, Social Sciences and Technology

International Conferences on Educational, Social Sciences and Technology

Fakultas Ilmu Pendidikan UNP

978-989-758-296-7

978-602-73537-9-4

April 2018

  View Articles

© 2024 GCI, Global Conferences Index, Lda - All rights reserved.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.