The Effect of School Principals Integrity, Communication Atmosphere, Discipline and Achievement Motivation on Teachers’ Work Productivity at Public Vocational High School (SMK) in Padang

Abstract

The phenomenon in the field illustrates the low productivity of teachers in assigning tasks. This research aims to reveal the influence of: (1) Integrity of principal and work discipline to motivation of teacher achievement in SMK, (2) Integrity of principal to teacher work discipline in SMK Negeri Kota Padang, (3) Integrity of principal, work discipline and motivation achievement on teacher work productivity in SMK Negeri Kota Padang. The sample of the study amounted to 266 people. The research data was collected by Likert scale model questionnaire. Data were analyzed by moderation variable path analysis technique. The result of the research shows that: (1) There is direct and indirect influence significantly Integrity of school principal and work discipline of teacher toward achievement motivation, (2) There is direct and indirect influence significantly Integrity of principal to work discipline (3) There is direct influence and not significantly the integrity of the principal, work discipline and achievement motivation affect the productivity of teachers work.

Keywords

integrity, discipline, motivation and productivity

References

  1. Arikunto, S. (2002). Prosedur Penelitian, Suatu Pendekatan Praktek. Jakarta: PT Rineka Cipta.
  2. Arikunto, Suharsimi. (1990). Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktek. Jakarta: Bina Aksara.
  3. Bangun, Wilson. (2012). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Erlangga:Jakarta
  4. Bertens, K. (1997). Etika. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
  5. Bernadin, J.H. Russell, A.J. (1998). Human Resource Management: an experiental approach. Singapure: A division of the mc graw hill company.
  6. Bacal, Robert. (2001). Performance Management. Jakarta: PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
  7. Becker, Thomas. (2001). Integrity in Organizations, USA: Internet.
  8. Bafadal, I. (2003). Peningkatan Profesionalisme Guru Sekolah Dasar. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
  9. Danim, Sudarwan. (2004). Motivasi, Kepemimpinan, dan Efektifitas Kelompok. PT Rineka Cipta. Jakarta.
  10. De Porter, Bobbi and Mike Hemacki. (2000). Quantum Learning. Diterjemahkah oleh Alwiyah Abdurrahman, Bandung: Kaifa.
  11. Dessler, Gary. (2004). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia.Edisi ke-9. Jilid 1. Jakarta: PT. Indeks kelompok Gramedia.
  12. Gellerman, Saul W. (2000). Motivation and Productivity. Bombay: D.B. Taraporevala Sons.
  13. Gaspersz, Vincent. (2001). Total Quality Management. Jakarta : PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
  14. Gea, Antonius, dkk. (2002). Character Building I: Relasi dengan Diri Sendiri. Edisi Revisi. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
  15. Ghiselli, E.E., & Brown, C.W. (2002). Personal and Industrial psychology, Mc Grow Hill, New York.
  16. Maxwell, Jhon. (1995). Mengembangkan Kepemimpinan di dalam Diri Anda, Jakarta: Binarupa Aksara.
  17. Maya. H. (2012). Kesalahan-kesalahan Umum Kepala Sekolah dalam Mengelola Pendidikan. Buku Biru. Jogjakarta.
  18. Milton. CR. (1981). Human Behavior in Organization Three Levels of Behavior. New York: Englewood Cliff, Prestice-Hall Inc.
  19. Miftah, Thoha, (2008). Perilaku Organisasi: Konsep Dasar dan Aplikasinya. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.
  20. Munandar, Utami. (2009). Pengembangan Kreativitas Anak Berbakat Jakarta :PT. Rineka Cipta.
  21. Mulyasa, E.. (2003). Manajemen Berbasis Sekolah. Bandung : Remaja Rosdakarya.
  22. Robins, Stephen. P. (2000), Prilaku Organisasi, Konsep, Kontroversi, Aplikasi, (Terjemahan Oleh Hadyana Pujatmika) Jakarta: Prenhallindo
  23. Robins, Stephen. P. (2003), Teori Organisasi: Struktur, Desain dan Aplikasi, Terjemahan Jusuf Udya, Jakarta : PT Arcan.
  24. Rathel, Jeanna Marie; Drasgow, Erik; Christle, Christine C. (2008). “Effects of Supervisor Performance Feedback on Increasing Preservice Teacher’s Positive Communication Behaviors with Students with Emotional and Behavioral Disorders”. Journal of Emotional and Behaviors Disorders; jun 2008; 16,2, page 67; access 1 januari 2014.
  25. Riduan. (2010). Cara Menggunakan dan Memaknai Path Analysis. Bandung: Alfabeta
  26. Rosidah, Ambar Teguh Sulistiyani. (2009). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia : Konsep Teori dan Pengembangan dalam Konteks Organisasi Publik. Graha Ilmu: Yogyakarta.

DOI : https://doi.org/10.29210/20181125