The role of counselor in preventing students’ attitudes toward cheating

Abstract

Attitude toward cheating is formed based on someone’s perspective, belief, and knowledge or information received about cheating. If the students’ attitude toward cheating ispositive, their affective evaluation tends to accept and assume that cheating is normal. The positive attitudes are more likely to be an action of approaching, liking even expecting cheating behavior to occur. Conversely, if the students’ attitude is negative, their affective evaluation tends to reject, disagree, and assume that cheating is a prohibited act and leadstheir attitude to become negative behavior. Therefore, counselors need to provide the understanding of guidance and counseling service as one of alternatives in preventing students’ cheating. This paper discusses the concept of cheating and the role of counselor to help students avoid cheating.

Keywords

attitides toward cheating, counselor, student.

References

  1. Ali, M., & Asrori, M. (2008). Psikologi Remaja Perkembangan Peserta Didik. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
  2. Afdal, A. (2015). Kolaboratif Kerja Konselor Masa Depan. Jurnal Konseling dan Pendidikan, 3(2).
  3. Barzegar, K., & Khezri, H. (2012). Predicting Academic Cheating Among the Fifth Grade Students; The Role of Self Efficacy and Academic Self-Handicapping. Journal of Life Science and Biomedicine, 2(1): 1-6.
  4. Brown, B. S., & Choong, P. (2011). Identifying the Salient Dimensions of Student Cheating and Their Key Determinants in a Private University. Journal of Business & Economics Research (JBER), 1(3): 75-84.
  5. Chaplin, J. P. (2011). Kamus Lengkap Psikologi. Terjemahan oleh Kartono, K. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.
  6. Clariana, M., Gotzens, C., Badia, D. M., & Cladellas, R. (2012). Procrastination and Cheating from Secondary School to University. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 10(27). 737-754
  7. Hartanto, D. (2012). Bimbingan & Konseling Menyontek: Mengungkap Akar Masalah dan Solusinya. Jakarta: Indeks.
  8. Indarto, Y., & Masrun. (2004). Hubungan Antara Orientasi Penguasaan dan Orientasi Performasi dengan Intensi Menyontek. Sosiosains, 17(3): 411-421.
  9. Koentjaraningrat. (2011). Pengantar Antropologi. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
  10. Marjohan., Asri, Z., Gusraredi., Ifdil., & Afriani, N. (2012). Biografi Keilmuan Prayitno dalam Ranah Konseling dan Pendidikan. Padang: UNP Press.
  11. Mujahidah. (2009). Perilaku Menyontek Laki-laki dan Perempuan: Studi meta analisis. Jurnal Psikologi, II(2): 177-199.
  12. Prayitno. (2014). Seri Layanan dan Kegiatan Pendukung Konseling. Padang: PPK FIP UNP.
  13. Sari, I., Marjohan., & Neviyarni. (2013). Locus of Control dan Perilaku Menyontek serta Implikasinya Terhadap Bimbingan dan Konseling (Studi pada Siswa Sekolah Menengah Atas Padang Ganting). Jurnal Ilmiah Konseling, 2(1): 267-272.
  14. Strom, P. S., & Strom, R. D. (2007). Cheating in Middle School and High School. Journal the Educational Forum. 71: 104-116.
  15. Walgito, B. (2011). Teori-teori Psikologi Sosial. Yogyakarta: Andi Offset.

DOI : https://doi.org/10.29210/2018141