Developing physics lesson plan for SMA by using problem based learning model with saintific approach

Abstract

The standard of content and the standard of process of curriculum 2013 require scientific learning, a scientific approach involving models that emphasize the problem. The purpose of this research to develope physics lesson plan for SMA by using Problem Based Learning with saintific approach with criteria valid, practis, efective. The kind of research is used research and development. The model development is used ADDIE model, it consist of analysis, design, development, implementation, evalution. The test of validity were done through validity sheet of learning device, practicality testing through observation sheet, questionnaire response of the teachers and the students, affectivity testing were obtained from the assessment of knowledge, attitude, characters, skills. Thisresearch was conducted at grade X of SMAN 4 Kerinci which consists of 35 students and two physics teachers as respondents.This research produces physics lesson plan used problem based learning model with saintific approach material Temperature, Heat and Transfer that valid, practis, efective.

Keywords

problem based learning model, saintific, lesson plan

References

  1. Akinoglu, O & Tandogan, R.O. (2006). The Effects of Problem-Based Active Learning in Science Education On Students Academic Achievment, Attitude and Concept Learning. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 3 (1):71-81.
  2. Arend, Richard I. (2008). Learning To Teach (Terjemahan Belajar Untuk Mengajar). Yogyakarta:Pustaka Belajar.
  3. Bilgin, Ibrahim, at.al. (2008). The Effects of Problem-Based Learning Instruction on University Students’ Performance of Conceptual and Quantitative Problems in Gas Concept. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science, & Technologi Education, 2009, 5(2), 153-164.
  4. De Vito, Joseph Alfred. (1989). The International Communication Book. Professional Book. Jakarta.
  5. Demirel, Melek and Turan, Belma. (2010). The Effects of Problem Based Learning on Achievement, Attitude, Metacognitive Awareness and Motivation.H.U. Journal of Education, 38: 55-66.
  6. Eggen, Paul & Don Kauchak. (2012). Strategi dan Model Pembelajaran. Jakarta: PT Indeks.
  7. Elniati Sri. (2007). Pengembangan Perangkat Matematika Berorientasi Konstruktivisme. Jurnal Guru 1:4,Fakultas Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam, Universitas Negeri Padang.
  8. Ermawati. (2007). Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Belah Ketupat dengan Pendekatan Kontektual dan Memperhatikan Tahap Berpikir Deometri Model Van hielle. Tesis, FMIPA UNESA.
  9. Hammond, Darling,L. & Bransford,J.Ed. (2005). Preparing Teacher for a Changing World. San Franciso: Jossy-Bass Publishing
  10. Holbrook, J. & Rannikmae, M. (2009). The meaning of scientific literacy. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 4(3): 275-288.
  11. Joyce, Bruce and Weil, Marsha. (1980). Models of Teaching (Second Edition). Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall,Inch
  12. Kemendikbud. (2013). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia Nomor 65 Tahun 2013. Tentang Standar proses pendidikan dasar dan menengah. Jakarta: Depdiknas
  13. Molenda M. (2003). The ADDIE Model, in,Educational Technology: An Encyclopedia (Eds.A. Kovalchick& K. Dawson) ABC-Clio, Santa Barbara, CA, (http://www.indiana.edu/~molpage/ The%20ADDIE %20Model_Encyclo.pdf , diakses 23 Oktober 2014)
  14. Mulyatiningsih, Endang. Pengembangan Model Pembelajaran. http://staff.uny. ac.id/ sites/ default/ files/ pengabdian/ dra-endang-mulyatiningsih-mpd/ 7pengembangan-model-pembelajaran.pdf. diakses 16 Oktober 2014
  15. Nieveen, N. (1999). Prototyping to Reach Product Quality. Jan Van den Akker, Robert Maribe Braneh, Ken Gustafson, and Tjeerd Plomp (Ed). London: Kluwer Academic plubishers
  16. Nurmaliati dkk. (2015). Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Fisika Materi Suhu dan Kalor Terintegrasi Thermoregulasi pada Manusia Berbasis Problem Based Learning. Jurnal Edu-Sains. 4(2).
  17. Prihatmanti, M.A. (2013). Efektivitas Program kesejahteraan sosial anak balita (PKSAB) di TAS Dr. Soetomo Surabaya. Jurnal Kebijakan dan Manajemen Publik. 1(1), Januari 2013
  18. Putra, Sitiatava Rizema. (2013). Desain Belajar Mengajar Kreatif Berbasis Sains. Yogyakarta: Diva Press
  19. Riduwan. (2009). Belajar Mudah Penelitian untuk Guru, Karyawan dan Peneliti Pemula. Bandung: Alfabeta.
  20. Sani, Ridwan Abdullah. (2014). Pembelajaran Saintifik Untuk Implementasi Kurikulum 2013. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
  21. Santrock JW. (2008). Psikologi Pendidikan (Educational Psychology). Edisi 3 Buku 1. Penerjemah Diana Angilica. Jakarta: Salemba Humanika
  22. Sudjana, Nana. (2008). Penilaian Hasil dan Proses BelajarMengajar. Bandung: SinarBaru.
  23. Sugiyono. (2010). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta
  24. Suhendi, Hendi. (2012). Pendekatan Pembelajaran Saintifik di Kurikulum 2013. (online). wordpress. com/2013 107/18/ pendekatan pembelajaran saintifik dikurikulum -20131. Diakses pada tanggal 5 Maret 2014.
  25. Sulardi. dkk. (2015). Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Fisika Model Problem Based Learning (PBL) Untuk Melatih Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Siswa.Jurnal Pendidikan Sains. Pascasarjana Universitas Negeri Surabaya.
  26. Susdarwati. dkk. (2016). Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Fisika Berbasis Problem Based Learning (PBL) pada Materi Hukum Newton dan Penerapannya Kelas X SMAN 2 Mejayan. Jurnal Inkuiri FKIP UNS.
  27. Yadnya, I G Agung. (2012). Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran BerorientasiDiscovery Inquiry Pokok Bahasan “Lingkaran” UntukMeningkatkan Aktivitas dan Hasil BelajarSiswa SMP Kelas VIII. Bali: Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha.
  28. Yerimadesi. dkk. (2016). Pengembangan Modul Kesetimbangan Kimia Berbasis Pendekatan Saintifik Untuk Kelas XI SMA/MA.Journal of Sainstek 8(1) : 85 – 97. AMSET-IAIN Batu Sangkar.
  29. Zamroni. (2000). Paradigma Pendidikan Masa Depan. Bigraf Publishing. Yogyakarta

DOI : https://doi.org/10.29210/2018170